Monday, November 9, 2009

The Rights of Woman








The Rights of Woman



     Man, are you capable of being just? It is a woman who poses the question; you will not deprive her of that right at least. Tell me, what gives you sovereign empire to opress my sex? Your strength? Your talents? Observe the Creator in his wisdom; survey in all her grandeur that nature with whom you seem to ant to be in harmony, and give me, if you dare, an exampl of this tyrannical empire. Go back to animals, consult the elements, study plants, finally glance at all the modifications of organic matter, and surrender to the evidence when I offer you the menas; search, probe, and distinguish, if you can, the sexes in the administration of nature. Everywhere you will find them mingled; everywhere they cooperate in harmonious tpgetherness in this immortal masterpiece.
     Man alone has raised his exceptional circumstances to a principle. Bizarre, blind, bloated with science and degenerated--in a century of enlightenment and wisdom--into the crassest ignorance, he wants to command as a despot a sex which is in full possession of its intellectual faculties; he pretends to enjoy the Revolution and to claim his rights to equality in order to say nothing more about it.




Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen



For the National Assemby to decree in its last sessions, or in those of the next legislature:




Preamble



     Mothers, daughters, sisters [and] representatives of the nation demand to be constituted into a national assembly. Believing that ignorance, omission, or scorn for the rights of woman are the only causes of public misfortunes and of the corruption of governments, [the women] have resolved to set forth a solemn declaration the natural, inalienable, and sacred rights of woman in order that this declaration, constantly exposed before all members of the society, will ceaselessly remind them of their rights and duties; in order that the authoritative acts f women and teh athoritative acts of men may be at any moment compared with and respectful of the purpose of all political institutions; and in order that citizens' demands, henceforth based on simple and incontestable principles, will always support the constitution, good morals, and the happiness of all.
     Consequently, the sex that is as superior in beauty as it is in courage during the sufferings of maternity recognizes and declares in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of WOman and of Female Citizens.



Article I



     Woman is born free and lives equal to man in her rights. Social distinctions can be based only on the common utility.




Article II



     The purpose of any political association is the conservation of the natural and impresciptible rights of woman and man; these rights are liberty property, security, and especially resistance to oppression.




Article III



     The principle of all sovereignty rests essentially with the nation, which is nothing but the union of woman and man; no body and no individual can exercise any authority which does not come expressly from it (the nation).




Article IV



     Liberty and justice consist of restoring all that belongs to others; thus, the only limits on the exercise of the natural rights of woman are perpetual male tyranny; these limits are to be reformed by the laws of nature and reason.




Article V



     Laws of nature and reason proscibe all acts harmful to society; everything which is not prohibited by these wise and divine laws cannot be prevented, and no one can be constrained to do what they do not command.




Article VI



     The law must be the expression of the general will; all female and male citizens must contribute either personally or through their representatives to its formation; it must be the same for all: male and female citizens, being equal in the eyes of the law, must be equally admitted to all honors, positions, and public employment according to their capacity and without other distinctions besides those of their virtues and talents.




Article VII



     No woman is an exception; she is accused, arrested, and detained in cases determined by law. Women, like men, obey this rigorous law.




Article VIII



     The law must establish only those penalties that are strictly and obviously necessary...




Article IX



     Once any woman is declared guilty, complete rigor is exercised by law.




Article X



     No one is to be disquieted for his very basic opinions; woman has the right to mount the scaffold; she must equally have the right to mount the rostrum, provided that her demonstrations do not disturb the legally established public order.




Article XI



     The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the most precious rights of woman, since that liberty assures recognition of children by their fathers. Any female citizen thus may say freely, I am the mother of a child which belongs to you, without being forced by a barbarous prejudice to hide the truth; (an exception may be made) to respond to the abuse of this liberty in cases determined by law.




Article XII



     The gaurantee of the rights of woman and the female citizen implies a major benefit; this guarantee must be instituted for the advantage of all, and not for the particular benefit of those to whom it is entrusted.




Article XIII



     For the support of the public force and the expenses of administration, the contributions of woman and man are equal; she shares all the duties and all the painful tasks; therefore, whe must have the same share in the distribution of positions, employment, offices, honors, and jobs.




Article XIV



     Female and male citizens have the right to verify, either by themselves of through their representatives, the necessity of the public contribution. This can only apply to women if they are granted an equal share, not only of wealth, but also of public administration, and in the determination of the proportion, the base, the collection, and the duration of the tax.




Article XV



     The collectivity of women, joined for tax purposes to the aggregate of men, has the right to demand an accounting of his administration from any public agent.




Article XVI



     No society has a constitution without the guarantee of rights and the separation of powers; the constitution is null if the majority of individuals comprising the nation have not cooperated in drafting it.




Article XVII



     Property belongs to both sexes whether united or separate; for each it is an inviolable and sacred right' no one can be deprived of it, since it is the true patrimony of natire, unless the legally determined public need obviously dictates it, and then only with a just and prior indemnity.

Postscript

     Woman, wake up; the tocsin of reason is being heard throughout the whole universe; discover your rights. The powerful empire of nature is no longer surrounded by prejudice, fanaticism, superstition, and lies. The flame of truth has dispersed all the clouds of folly and usurpation. Enslaved man has multiplied his strength and needs recourse to yours to break his chains. Having become free, he has become unjust to his companion. Oh, women, women! When will you cease to be blind? What advantage have you received from the Revolution? A more pronounced scorn, a more marked disdain. In the centuries of corruption you ruled only over the weakness of men. The reclamation of your patrimony, based on the wise decrees of nature-what have you to dread from such a fine undertaking? The bon mot of the legislator of the marriage of Cana? Do you fear that our French legislators, correctors of that morality, long ensnared by political practices now out of date, will only say again to you: women, what is there in common between you and us? Everything, you will have to answer. If they persist in their weakness in putting this non sequitur in contradiction to their principles, courageously oppose the force of reason to the empty pretentions of superiority; unite yourselves beneath the standards of philosophy; deploy all the energy of your character, and you will soon see these haughty men, not groveling at your feet as servile adorers, but proud to share with you the treasures of the Supreme Being. Regardless of what barriers confront you, it is in your power to free yourselves; you have only to want to....
     Marriage is the tomb of trust and love. The married woman can with impunity give bastards to her husband, and also give them the wealth which does not belong to them. The woman who is unmarried has only one feeble right; ancient and inhuman laws refuse to her for her children the right to the name and the wealth of their father; no new laws have been made in this matter. If it is considered a paradox and an impossibility on my part to try to give my sex an honorable and just consistency, I leave it to men to attain glory for dealing with this matter; but while we wait, the way can be prepared through national education, the restoration of morals, and conjugal conventions.




Form for a Social Contract Between Man and Woman



     We, _____ and ______, moved by our own will, unite ourselves for the duration of our lives, and for the duration of our mutual inclinations, under the following conditions: We intend and wish to make our wealth communal, meanwhile reserving to ourselves the right to divide it in favor of our children and of those toward whom we might have a particular inclination, mutually recognizing that our property belongs directly to our children, from whatever bed they come, and that all of them without distinction have the right to bear the name of the fathers and mothers who have acknowledged them, and we are charged to subscribe to the law which punishes the renunciation of one's own blood. We likewise obligate ourselves, in case of separation, to divide our wealth and to set aside in advance the portion the law indicates for our children, and in the event of a perfect union, the one who dies will divest himself of half his property in his children's favor, and if one dies childless, the survivor will inherit by right, unless the dying person has disposed of half the common property in favor of one whom he judged deserving.      That is approximately the formula for the marriage act I propose for execution. Upon reading this strange document, I see rising up against me the hypocrites, the prudes, the clergy, and the whole infernal sequence. But how it [my proposal] offers to the wise the moral means of achieving the perfection of a happy government! . . .
     Moreover, I would like a law which would assist widows and young girls deceived by the false promises of a man to whom they were attached; I would like, I say, this law to force an inconstant man to hold to his obligations or at least [to pay] an indemnity equal to his wealth. Again, I would like this law to be rigorous against women, at least those who have the effrontery to have reCourse to a law which they themselves had violated by their misconduct, if proof of that were given. At the same time, as I showed in Le Bonheur primitit de l'homme, in 1788, that prostitutes should be placed in designated quarters. It is not prostitutes who contribute the most to the depravity of morals, it is the women of' society. In regenerating the latter, the former are changed. This link of fraternal union will first bring disorder, but in consequence it will produce at the end a perfect harmony.
     I offer a foolproof way to elevate the soul of women; it is to join them to all the activities of man; if man persists in finding this way impractical, let him share his fortune with woman, not at his caprice, but by the wisdom of laws. Prejudice falls, morals are purified, and nature regains all her rights. Add to this the marriage of priests and the strengthening of the king on his throne, and the French government cannot fail.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Danton movie discussion questions


1.      What do you make of the opening scene when Eleanore Duplay is teaching her brother to recite the keystone document of the Revolution, “The Rights of Man and Citizen”?
2.       In the central scene of the film, Danton and Robespierre meet in a hotel.  What do you think is the point of showing other guests who are then hounded out?
3.       What is the point of having Madame Desmoulins go everywhere with her infant in arms?  The Desmoulins are portrayed as being rather well off and probably had a servant or two to look after the baby.
4.       What does Robespierre’s speech at the Convention intend to show?
5.       What does the musical score add to the film?
6.       What do you think is the meaning of the final scene with Robespierre in bed?
7.       Some critiques claim that historical films reveal more about the period in which they were made than about the period they portray.  To what extent do you think this is true of Danton?
8.       However flawed it may be, what does Danton contribute to your understanding of the French Revolution?

Monday, October 26, 2009

The French Revolution as it appeared to Enthusiasts


Oh! pleasant exercise of hope and joy!
For mighty were the auxiliars which then stood
Upon our side, we who were strong in love!
Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive,
But to be young was very heaven!--Oh! times,
In which the meagre, stale, forbidding ways
Of custom, law, and statute, took at once
The attraction of a country in romance!
When Reason seemed the most to assert her rights,
When most intent on making of herself
A prime Enchantress--to assist the work
Which then was going forward in her name!
Not favoured spots alone, but the whole earth,
The beauty wore of promise, that which sets
(As at some moment might not be unfelt
Among the bowers of paradise itself )
The budding rose above the rose full blown.
What temper at the prospect did not wake
To happiness unthought of? The inert
Were roused, and lively natures rapt away!
They who had fed their childhood upon dreams,
The playfellows of fancy, who had made
All powers of swiftness, subtilty, and strength
Their ministers,--who in lordly wise had stirred
Among the grandest objects of the sense,
And dealt with whatsoever they found there
As if they had within some lurking right
To wield it;--they, too, who, of gentle mood,
Had watched all gentle motions, and to these
Had fitted their own thoughts, schemers more wild,
And in the region of their peaceful selves;--
Now was it that both found, the meek and lofty
Did both find, helpers to their heart's desire,
And stuff at hand, plastic as they could wish;
Wcre called upon to exercise their skill,
Not in Utopia, subterranean fields,
Or some secreted island, Heaven knows where!
But in the very world, which is the world
Of all of us,--the place where in the end
We find our happiness, or not at all!

William Wordsworth

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Hobbes and Republican Liberty


Revolution sent Thomas Hobbes into exile; reaction sent him back. In 1640 parliamentary opponents of Charles I such as John Pym were denouncing anyone "preaching for absolute monarchy that the king may do what he list." Hobbes had recently finished writing The Elements of Law, which did just that. After the king's top adviser and a theologian of unlimited royal power were both arrested, Hobbes decided it was time to go. Not waiting for his bags to be packed, he fled England for France.

Eleven years and a civil war later, Hobbes fled France for England. This time, he was running from the royalists. As before, Hobbes had just finished a book. Leviathan, he would later explain, "fights on behalf of all kings and all those who under whatever name bear the rights of kings." It was this seeming indifference about the identity of the sovereign that was now getting him into trouble.

READ MORE


Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Notes from Natalie Davis


Facts (and some suppositions), from the historical record, about the Martin Guerre story…

  • Martin's family –the Daguerres--moved from Basque country to Artigat in Languedoc (over the Pyrenees)
  • They were barely literate—Basque language complex and not generally amenable to writing; never signed contracts with family name
  • They changed Daguerre (Basque) to Guerre (to fit in)
  • Guerres were prosperous; owned a tileworks
  • Martin was not a usual name in Artigat: it would have attracted ridicule
  • Martin was 14 years old when he was married; i.e. he was still a boy
  • Bertrande was married to Martin at the age of 8 or 9. This was younger than usual and probably a violation of canon law. But the marriage was sanctioned by the local curate—this permissiveness can be partially be explained by the fact that Artigat was somewhat independent: it had no seigneur (lord)
  • Artigat was prosperous and to a large extent self-governing-- more or less outside the orbit of the feudal French church and state
  • Bertrande's family, the Rols, were well- to-do peasants and prominent in the region
  • Bertrande would have stayed at home helping her mother spin wool until marriage, with little exposure to the outside world
  • The Guerres would have been eager to marry their only son up into her family.
  • The very fact of their marriage is a demonstration of the openness of Languedocans to newcomers


  • Bertrande's dowry was likely the equivalent in value of a vineyard or a field
  • Her failure to become pregnant would have been cause for ridicule by the townsfolk (e.g. the "charivari")
  • Martin's impotence was blamed on powerful "outside" women – as was typical--who were perhaps jealous of his good fortune of marrying well
  • Bertrande was also "bewitched"—(or was she just very young and in a strange house…perhaps she was relieved that she could not have intercourse).
  • She refused to leave Martin and have the marriage annulled, which her mother was pressuring her to do; when SHE was ready, the witch "appeared from heaven" to undo the spell…


  • Can Martin's flight be partly attributed to his being uncomfortable with the new language, his dominating father, as well as his longstanding impotence?
  • It was typical for young peasant men to take some time for "sowing oats" –as shepherds (or in Basque country, going to see, whaling)—Martin, married young, did not have this opportunity
  • Joining the army was another option and there were plenty of chances to do that under King Francois I.
  • After the theft of his father's grain, Martin ran away and ended up a "lackey" in the Spanish court of the Catholic Cardinal of Burgos.
  • Martin joined the Spanish army of Philip II; he fought against the French (this was high treason!)—and lost a leg at the 1557 Battle of San Quentin, an important Spanish victory over the French in the Habsburg-Valois Wars.
Why did Pierre Guerre and others "turn on" the new "Martin"?

  • "Martin's" practice of selling off parcels of family land, while common in Languedoc, was contrary to Basque custom
  • The Village was split over Martin's identity: NZD speculates that perhaps the split was along Catholic-Protestant lines
  • Some people suspected him of utilizing magic to assume another's personality and life…this must have created tremendous unease
  • NZD speculates that in the traditional interdependent world of the village, relationships built on big lies were not sustainable…
The movie deviates from record:

  • "Martin" is convicted in his first trial in Rieux, after the court hears testimony from 150 people—under threat of excommunication if they lie. Forty-five testified he was Pansette; 30-40 said he was MG –including his four sisters--and the rest (60 or so) were uncertain.
  • The trial in Toulouse was "Martin's" appeal of the guilty verdict (paid for by him)
  • Coras is convinced by "Martin" and considers torturing Pierre to see whether he will admit to conspiring to kill "Martin."
  • According to NZD, the movie portrays Bertrande as a 19th century "romantic" who acts without practical concern for her own (or her children's interest), following only her heart. The real Bertrrande plays a double role. She is concerned about protecting her honor (and inheritance) and hedges her bets regarding the outcome. She becomes a party to the lawsuit against him. She then tells the judge she was coerced into it by Pierre—but refused to take an oath that "Martin" was her husband.
  • NZD does not think Bertrande was a victim at all. Far from it; all indications are that she was a party to the deception: she was making independent choices about what she wanted in her life and her body
  • She speculates that this was (at least partly) a result of the fact that there were new ideas (Protestant ideas) about...including new ideas about marriage. "It was no longer a sacrament" – an abandoned wife could divorce. Also, Martin and Bertrande, living as "true married people" could "tell their story to God and need not communicate it to any human intermediary"
  • There is good reason to believe B errand and "Martin" were touched by the new ideas. We know that the Rols family converted to Protestantism.
  • It is significant that NO priests from Artigat played a role in the trial.
  • Unlike the public spectacle of the film, trials in 16th century France always heard testimony in secret. They were intended to be "fearsome" for the defendant not forums for grandstanding speeches. They were also apt to torture the accused to get them to confess.
  • There were other minor deviations from the record in the film--for cinematic and financial considerations (e.g. color of judges gowns)
  • Jean de Coras was already becoming attracted to Protestantism when the trial was in progress. He was expelled from the Toulouse Parlement in 1568 for his sympathies and was among those Protestant judges who were lynched in 1572 by a Catholic mob.
  • NZD , analyzing his book about the "Prodigious Imposter, " sees a degree of admiration in Coras' attitude about "Martin"/Arnaud du Tilh (his real name). He admires his intelligence and especially his "self-fashioning" behavior.

Monday, September 21, 2009

The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same?

Rasmussen Poll: 2006 National survey found that 54% of American adults believe the Bible is literally true
75% in Arkansas, Alabama Believe Bible Literally True
Only 22% in Vermont, Massachusetts



http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/august_2006/75_in_arkansas_alabama_believe_bible_literally_true

Not surprisingly, the Bible Belt region lives up to its name with states like Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee and West Virginia containing the highest percentage of those who believe the Bible is literally true. Alabama and Arkansas came out on top as 75% say they believe the Bible is literally true. West Virginia (70%) and Tennessee (68%) are close behind.
The northeast region of our map represents the other extreme. In Vermont and Massachusetts, only 22% of those respondents believe the Bible is literally true—the lowest percentages in all states surveyed.
Earlier this summer, a national survey found that 54% of American adults believe the Bible is literally true.
In Arkansas, the question proves to be one of the rare ones that doesn’t cause divisions along party lines; 83% of Republicans and 75% of Democrats say the believe in the Bible’s literal truth. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of women and 69% of men identify themselves as true believers.
In Alabama, Democrats and Republicans both share high levels of belief on the authenticity and literal truth of the Bible. Women again outnumber men, though by a smaller percentage, 79% to 72%. The states differ, though, when the question is dissected by respondents’ ages. Percentages of those agreeing with the Bible’s authenticity are in the high 70’s across all age demographics for Alabama. In Arkansas, however, percentages are actually higher for younger voters. Eighty-one percent (81%) of those 18-29 and 83% of those 30-39 believe the Bible’s literal truth and then the numbers drop off, hitting a low of 66% for voters ages 50-64.
In Vermont, 37% of GOP voters and only 14% of Democrats say they are believers. Along age lines, the highest percentage of believers are those ages 65 and older (36%.)
In Massachusetts, Republican believers again outnumber Democrats (39% to 17%) Surprisingly, among conservatives in the state, the percentage of those who believe the Bible is true (41%) is outweighed by the percentage who do not (44%.)
As expected, strong connections exist in most of the states surveyed between the percentage of those who answered affirmatively on the Bible question and their positions on abortion and same-sex marriage. See Daily Snapshot to go to tables with a state-by-state breakdown of responses on all three subjects for Premium Members.
The national survey was of all adults. The state surveys consisted of Likely Voter samples. The results may not be directly comparable.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Weakening influence of Church in The Return of Martin Guerre

The story of Bertrande and Martin takes place in the middle of the 16th century, a period that coincides with our readings in Ch 14 & 15.  The locale is the town of Atrigat in southwestern France in the  region known as the Languedoc.

Protestant missionaries began arriving in the county of Foix by 1536 and Protestantism spread throughout this region. Towns nearby to Artigat, declared themselves "Reformed" in the 1560's. (At one point in the late 16th century the Huguenots controlled over 200 towns in southern and western France.) You can see the spread of Protestantism on the map on page 453.

In this light, consider:
  • At the time of their marriage, Martin was only14 years old (no wonder he was sexually inadequate!), and Bertrande was only 8 or 9 (pehaps she was afraid as well?).  She was younger than the usual marriage age. It was probably a violation of canon law for her to marry but the local curate allowed the wedding to go forward anyway. 
  • In the film, Jean de Coras, the investigating magistrate says to Bertrande that she must tell them everything, in spite of what the priest said...

Search This Blog